So, we’ve all heard the saying, “If at first you don’t succeed, try and try again.” Dr Leaf has certainly done that.
Dr Caroline Leaf is a Communication Pathologist and self-titled Cognitive Neuroscientist. Not content to completely misinterpret James 1:21 only once, she posted on social media today, “James 1:21. Our thoughts and perceptions have a direct and overwhelmingly significant effect on the cells of our body.”
If for nothing else, Dr Leaf at least gets points for persistence. A week and a half ago, Dr Leaf again used James 1:21 to attempt to justify a meme on perception. I’d love to know what version of the Bible that she’s using, because it seems that in her Bible, James 1:21 can be interpreted any way that one wants.
Lets recap: James 1:21 says,
“Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls.” (KJV)
There are too many big words there for my liking, so I went through an on-line, widely used Greek lexicon, to look at the meanings of the words. Then I translated them into something more understandable, to make sure that I didn’t miss the bit about perception.
Using the Strong’s dictionary and concordance built in to the Blue Letter Bible site (http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Jas&c=1&v=21&t=KJV#s=1147021) I was able to translate the original Greek into something more manageable.
“Therefore shed all the morally defiling wickedness and excess malice, and, with meekness, embrace the teaching that is implanted by your mentors, which has the power to rescue your eternal soul.”
Wait … where did James talk about perception, and how our cells react to our thoughts? Reviewing the scripture and its translation the second time around didn’t change anything, because there is nothing in James 1:21 that is in any way remotely connected to perception, thinking and our cells biological functioning.
Scripture is the inspired word of God, and “is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.” (2 Tim 3:16-17, NIV) What James is writing about is essential, and Christians need to embrace what he was teaching.
Which is why it is so important for Dr Leaf to interpret scripture correctly. For the second time in two weeks, Dr Leaf has completely misapplied a scripture to one of her memes. As if that isn’t concerning enough for a woman than regularly interprets scripture to audiences in the thousands every week, there isn’t any scientific evidence to back up her claim either. As I have written about before, there is no evidence that the mind controls the brain. Rather, our psychology is dependant on our biology. More on this in future posts. But the onus is on Dr Leaf to provide evidence to back up her claim. I encourage her to publish specific evidence that she believes justifies her claims that our thoughts alter our cellular biology.
Otherwise, I think another popular phrase would better apply: “Quit while you’re ahead”.
I was reviewing Dr Leaf’s posts tonight, and I came across this response that Dr Leaf posted on the 5th of June. Clearly I wasn’t the only person who wondered exactly how James 1:21 applied to her meme.
Dr Leaf’s explained: “By ‘implanting the word of God your soul will be saved’ (James 1:21) – so by memorizing God’s Word we build healthy thoughts into our brain that improve the health of our cells.”
I’m sure that Dr Leaf thought she was climbing out of a hole, although I think she’s only dug herself deeper.
Firstly, while I’m not a trained theologian, I can read. Dr Leaf reinterprets this long-suffering scripture again, “By ‘implanting the word of God your soul will be saved’.” But that’s not what it says at all. From the KJV which I originally quoted: ” … receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls.” (Emphasis added) It’s a subtle but important difference. My understanding is that salvation comes confession and repentance (Romans 10:9-10, 2 Corinthians 7:10). The word of God is able to save souls, but as the Parable of the Sower (Luke 8:4-15) shows, it doesn’t always bear fruit. Satan himself knows the Bible inside out, but he certainly isn’t saved. Perhaps someone who is theologically trained can confirm the points here. I’d certainly appreciate it. But for now, I propose that Dr Leaf has misinterpreted this scripture again.
Dr Leaf goes on to claim that by memorizing scripture, “we build healthy thoughts in our brain that improve the health of our cells.” Dr Leaf is really grasping at straws here. The “soul” that James is referring to is psyche in the Greek, translated as “the seat of the feelings, desires, affections, aversions (our heart, soul etc.); the (human) soul in so far as it is constituted that by the right use of the aids offered it by God it can attain its highest end and secure eternal blessedness, the soul regarded as a moral being designed for everlasting life; the soul as an essence which differs from the body and is not dissolved by death (distinguished from other parts of the body)”. (http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G5590&t=KJV) So the word that James used has nothing to do with the body.
Dr Leaf has to apply her own set of assumptions to the scripture, that a saved soul must be healthy thoughts, and that healthy thoughts leads to healthy cells. Its a myth that healthy thoughts lead to healthy cells (more on this in a future post). To suggest that salvation and healthy thoughts are one and the same is also an assumption on Dr Leaf’s part, which I don’t think the scripture supports in any way.
So in short, Dr Leaf’s explanation really hasn’t helped her cause. Her meme is still scripturally and scientifically baseless.